Mid-January, I called the Director of
Emergency Dept. for the San Ramon Regional Medical Center in regards
to outstanding bills sent to collection I purposefully have not paid.
The bills were generated in early April, 2012, when my son was
admitted to the hospital's emergency room, referred by his primary
care physician, for [poorly diagnosed] possible appendicitis. I paid
the hospital only 15% to date [of an over $1,000 bill beyond
insurance coverage], included in a letter to the Director in June,
2012, and nothing to their vendors—from doctor bills, to radiation,
to ultrasound, because both my husband and I feel many of the
procedures pushed on our son were unnecessary.
I explained this again on the phone to
the Director when I called a few weeks ago in regards to this still
open issue, to stop the harassing phone calls at all hours from
collection agencies. The hospital had yet to contact me, even once,
in response to my original letter in 2012. They cashed the check
though.
During our recent call, I again
questioned the SRRMC emergency procedures in response to admitting
our son. The Director was polite, but insisted the hospital had done
nothing wrong, that even giving my son the flu test (least expensive
and fastest results) first, instead of last as they did, they would
have insisted on the chest x-rays, and the ultra-sound, and the I.V.
If they'd found the flu virus, as they did, first, instead of last,
and I'd said no to the additional tests, satisfied with the flu
results, the Director then said the hospital would have called the
police and child services and had me arrested for child endangerment
and taken my son from me.
I was so taken aback by this blatant
threat that I questioned it's meaning, and the Director repeated it,
then again and again throughout our dialog. In fact, every time I
questioned anything his staff did, he threatened me with legal
action. He informed me the admitting doctor who originally saw my son
regularly testifies in court cases and 'handles these types of things
all the time,' referring to hospital lawsuits. When I questioned him
why chest x-rays for possible appendicitis, he assured me six x-rays
were necessary, though two doctors had listened to my son's chest
through a stethoscope and admittedly heard no congestion.
Every question I had about the
hospital's rational behind the extensive procedures performed on our
son, and the Director insisted had my
husband or I attempted to take our son from Emergency, they would
have called the police and had us arrested. He assured me we made the
right decision to keep our son there until the hospital was ready to
release him—six hours and, regardless of our protests, two invasive and two non-invasive
procedures preformed.
Forty-five minutes into our circular
dialog, the Director offered to remove the ultrasound charges from
our hospital bill. I questioned why the ultrasound if my son was
admitted for possible appendicitis. Why not the x-ray, or both since
he'd had no symptoms of appendicitis, his abdomen was not distended,
nor had he vomited, was not constipated or experience pain when
urinating, as is typical with appendicitis. In fact, he was awake and
alert and watching TV in the hospital bed, and his stomach pains had
subsided.
The Director had no response to my
questions. He retracted his offer, suggested I retrieve my son's
hospital records, then challenged me to get a doctor, a pediatrician,
in fact, to confirm they did anything wrong, in writing, before he
would take anything off our bill. Of course, the hospital
records, entered that April day by the doctor's, will not reflect our consistent protests with every recommended test, nor the three hour
wait between tests with what the Director claims the hospital
considered a possible life-threatening emergency. The hospital
records won't reveal both my husband's and my continual pleas for the
hospital to administer a simple flu test, which the nurse indicated
both doctors had neglected to order until after all the expensive,
invasive tests were performed.
San Ramon Region Medical Center is the
closest hospital within ten miles. We'd like to be able to count on
them as a medical resource, however, the Director's threats when the
hospital's authority is challenged is very concerning. His basic
contention [at least] in the emergency room is they can do whatever
they want, to whomever they want, whenever they want without
question. And this is very dangerous, indeed. My husband and I have
filed a complaint against the hospital with our insurance carrier,
but it's unlikely they'll take any action. They don't care about
their over $12,000 bill for the treatment and procedures performed on
our son. They'll just pass the loss on to their customers with higher
rates, and justify the increase with rising medical costs.
ObamaCare may be the beginning, but
we're still so very far from regulating medical fraud, or eliminating
the need for insurance entirely by instituting fair and equitable
public health care.

1 comment:
Perhaps, after the government finishes investigating Wall Street, they will start on medical fraud ... :(
Why is it that the middle class ends up with the bill for all this, and we don't complain?
In any event, excellent article, just gets me pissed off all over again
Post a Comment